Obviously, the legislation is the religious rights' moral crusade rather than they caring for the few victims. But all is not lost. The F-S is already infringing net neutrality and freedom. It won't end well if they carry on further.
Private people having sex really not as in your face as the numerous escort ads on Backpage. That's why they have the F-S to stop that. Some websites are resisting successfully, moving offshore accepting bitcoins. What next? Strip clubs are American institutions that they can't touch easily. The same for massage parlors. Further legislation to punish those who pay for sex may change that but may backfire.
More on your face than BP ads? Camgirls. Every teen knows when you turn on the internet, there is an unlimited supply of impossibly pretty girls of all types available 24/7 to show off every bit of themselves, with sex acts too. Ads are fake. Camgirls are real. The crusade is already underway. An army is already outing camgirls, cutting off their payments and block their banks. This cannot last.
The freedom of the internet depends on freedom of contents, freedom of communications, freedom of payment, the freedom to persuade happiness particularly there are no victims to speak of. It's like trying to ban the printed version of old Playboy. It will sure backfire like the prohibition. You cannot kill Playboy but can replace it with better - cam girls.
The day when the cam shows taper off, it's the day when the line is crossed. Backfire is certain. Before that, F-S will be in vain at the end. It may be difficult and risky for adults to buy sex, but the new generation is well experienced on the pleasure of sex, if only visually. I bet when they have the means they will try to buy fresh and blood. That is a battle you can't win. That is a sure-fail battle to turn back the clock - the wrong definition of conserve.
Private people having sex really not as in your face as the numerous escort ads on Backpage. That's why they have the F-S to stop that. Some websites are resisting successfully, moving offshore accepting bitcoins. What next? Strip clubs are American institutions that they can't touch easily. The same for massage parlors. Further legislation to punish those who pay for sex may change that but may backfire.
More on your face than BP ads? Camgirls. Every teen knows when you turn on the internet, there is an unlimited supply of impossibly pretty girls of all types available 24/7 to show off every bit of themselves, with sex acts too. Ads are fake. Camgirls are real. The crusade is already underway. An army is already outing camgirls, cutting off their payments and block their banks. This cannot last.
The freedom of the internet depends on freedom of contents, freedom of communications, freedom of payment, the freedom to persuade happiness particularly there are no victims to speak of. It's like trying to ban the printed version of old Playboy. It will sure backfire like the prohibition. You cannot kill Playboy but can replace it with better - cam girls.
The day when the cam shows taper off, it's the day when the line is crossed. Backfire is certain. Before that, F-S will be in vain at the end. It may be difficult and risky for adults to buy sex, but the new generation is well experienced on the pleasure of sex, if only visually. I bet when they have the means they will try to buy fresh and blood. That is a battle you can't win. That is a sure-fail battle to turn back the clock - the wrong definition of conserve.